In New Hampshire right now, President Trump introduced a plan for his administration’s response to opioid dependancy and overdose. Trump steadily characterised his plan as “getting powerful” on medication and reiterated requires drug battle methods that proof has proven fail to discourage drug promoting or drug use – together with ramping up felony punishment for drug regulation violations and resurrecting disproven “simply say no” campaigns aimed toward youth. Trump additionally repeated his assist for imposing the loss of life penalty for individuals who promote medication. Whereas Trump’s plan consists of some modest efforts to increase entry to naloxone and medication-assisted remedy, any progress could possibly be derailed by a rise in drug enforcement efforts.
Earlier right now, the Drug Coverage Alliance hosted a tele-press convention with consultants on human rights, regulation enforcement, drug coverage and felony justice reform. A recording of this tele-press convention is out there right here.
The next are statements from the audio system who participated in right now’s name:
Maria McFarland Sánchez-Moreno, govt director of the Drug Coverage Alliance:
“President Trump’s proposed response to the overdose disaster right now— with its name for the loss of life penalty and harsher sentences, and its demonization of immigrants—can be each merciless and ineffective. It’s a cynical attraction to the worst instincts of his base. As a substitute, it ought to function a name to motion to everybody who cares about well being, life, and trustworthy authorities, to demand actual options to overdose. Trump’s failure to put money into hurt discount methods that work, or to place sources behind evidence-based remedy, reveal a profound disdain for the many individuals now struggling resulting from this disaster.”
Nicole Austin-Hillery, Government Director of US Packages, Human Rights Watch:
“President Trump’s proposal for addressing the opioid disaster emphasizes the identical rights-abusing enforcement and excessive sentencing we witnessed within the 80s and 90s”, mentioned Nicole Austin-Hillery, govt director of the US Program at Human Rights Watch. “If Trump have been actually critical, he would give attention to increasing confirmed well being interventions and supporting sentencing reform, as Congress has been doing with bipartisan success. As a substitute, he continues to revive the drug battle, now utilizing the loss of life penalty, which Human Rights Watch vehemently opposes and which is at present being questioned for its inhumanity and waning assist. Merely put, use of the loss of life penalty is a disproportionate strategy that can have zero influence on trafficking or dependancy.”
Main Neill Franklin (Ret.), Government Director, Legislation Enforcement Motion Partnership:
“Because the opioid disaster destroys much more lives, we should reject any coverage that doubles-down on the failed methods that created this drawback within the first place,” mentioned Main Neill Franklin (Ret.), govt director of the Legislation Enforcement Motion Partnership. “I condemn prolonged jail sentences and the loss of life penalty for drug traffickers as a result of there is not any proof they cut back dependancy or overdose deaths. However, public well being methods, akin to syringe trade applications and protected consumption websites, are confirmed options backed by years of success.”
Vanita Gupta, President and CEO, The Management Convention on Civil and Human Rights, Former Head of the U.S. Dept. of Justice’s Civil Rights Division:
“The opioid disaster is a nationwide tragedy. Sadly, the Trump administration is utilizing the identical failed, damaged playbook on felony justice. They’re looking for a decidedly punitive strategy to the nation’s drug drawback – one which seeks to extend already disproportionate sentences for drug offenses and make use of the loss of life penalty. That is greater than only a felony justice concern – it’s a public well being concern. We can not enact cynical coverage that has purely rhetorical attraction. We can not simply do what feels good, or sounds good. We should take an evidenced-based strategy to ending the opioid disaster.”
Marc Mauer, Government Director, The Sentencing Undertaking:
“Imposing harsher penalties for drug sellers is hardly a brand new concept. The US has a long time of expertise using punitive ways to confront medication which have had a restricted influence on substance use. With the intention to obtain a greater stability in our strategy to medication we have to make investments extra in confirmed strategies of prevention and remedy.”